Current:Home > Contact-usOpinion: Corporate ballpark names just don't have that special ring-DB Wealth Institute B2 Expert Reviews
Opinion: Corporate ballpark names just don't have that special ring
View Date:2024-12-23 20:42:01
Ballpark names aren't what they used to be. And I mean that — to use an overworked word of our times — literally.
Oracle Park in San Francisco used to be Pac-Bell, after it was SBC, after it was AT&T Park. U.S. Cellular Field in Chicago, which some of us might think of as, "the new Comiskey Park", is now Guaranteed Rate Field. Does anyone ever say, "Gosh, they got great dogs at Guaranteed Rate Field!" T-Mobile Park in Seattle is the new name for Safeco Field. Progressive Field in Cleveland has nothing to do with Bernie Sanders — it's the name of an insurance company, on the stadium that used to be Jacobs Field.
The Houston Astros play in Minute Maid Park. It was Enron Field when the park opened in 2000, but in 2001, the oil company went bankrupt in a sensational accounting scandal. The Astros had to sue to get the Enron name off of their ballpark, but won their division. They had a better year than Enron.
Fans like me might be pointlessly sentimental when it comes to stadium names, but they used to be personal, not corporate. They were named after people, sometimes the owners: Comiskey and Wrigley in Chicago, Crosley in Cincinnati, and Griffith in Washington, D.C. Ebbets Field in Brooklyn was named for a man who used to be a ticket taker, but would come to own the Dodgers. Some other names came from the stadiums' locations: Fenway, a neighborhood in Boston, or Candlestick, for a tip of land that juts into San Francisco Bay.
And of course what name invokes more fame and grandeur than Yankee Stadium?
The change came when teams realized they could sell companies the rights to put their corporate monikers on their ballparks, and turn the whole thing into a billboard. But naming rights may not be as extravagant an expenditure as you think.
It costs JPMorgan Chase and Co. $3.3 million a year to put their bank name on the Phoenix ballpark. It costs Petco $2.7 million a year to put their pet supply company name on San Diego's ballpark, and the Guaranteed Rate Mortgage Company pays just over $2 million a year to have their name on the stadium where the White Sox play.
I don't want to characterize any of those fees as chump change. But the average salary of a major league ballplayer today is higher than any of those rates, at nearly $5 million a year.
Instead of seeing stadium names as one more chance to sell advertising, teams could salute players and fans by naming their parks after one of their own departed greats. There should be a Jackie Robinson Park, a Roberto Clemente Field, and one day perhaps, a Shohei Otani Stadium. They're the names that made games worth watching.
veryGood! (28)
Related
- Can't afford a home? Why becoming a landlord might be the best way to 'house hack.'
- Can shark repellents avoid your becoming shark food?
- Who created chicken tikka masala? The death of a curry king is reviving a debate
- This Is Not a Drill: Save $60 on the TikTok-Loved Solawave Skincare Wand That Works in 5 Minutes
- Powerball winning numbers for November 11 drawing: Jackpot hits $103 million
- Donations to food banks can't keep up with rising costs
- Sam Bankman-Fried to be released on $250 million bail into parents' custody
- Tree Deaths in Urban Settings Are Linked to Leaks from Natural Gas Pipelines Below Streets
- Harriet Tubman posthumously named a general in Veterans Day ceremony
- Europe Seeks Solutions as it Grapples With Catastrophic Wildfires
Ranking
- FSU football fires offensive, defensive coordinators, wide receivers coach
- Russian fighter pilots harass U.S. military drones in Syria for second straight day, Pentagon says
- Could New York’s Youth Finally Convince the State to Divest Its Pension of Fossil Fuels?
- These $23 Men's Sweatpants Have 35,500+ 5-Star Amazon Reviews
- These Michael Kors’ Designer Handbags Are All Under $150 With an Extra 22% off for Singles’ Day
- Many Nations Receive Failing Scores on Climate Change and Health
- CVS and Walgreens limit sales of children's meds as the 'tripledemic' drives demand
- With Coal’s Dominance in Missouri, Prospects of Clean Energy Transition Remain Uncertain
Recommendation
-
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Mixed Use
-
Interest rates up, but not on your savings account
-
Trade War Fears Ripple Through Wind Energy Industry’s Supply Chain
-
Fiancée speaks out after ex-boyfriend shoots and kills her husband-to-be: My whole world was taken away
-
Where is 'College GameDay' for Week 12? Location, what to know for ESPN show
-
A Federal Court Delivers a Victory for Sioux Tribe, Another Blow for the Dakota Access Pipeline
-
A Southern Governor’s Climate and Clean Energy Plan Aims for Zero Emissions
-
Why the government fails to limit many dangerous chemicals in the workplace